3.08.2006

[Musings] Time for a change

At around 13:00 today I had to take a walk. I had to step away from work for a while, a morning of problems, missed meetings, and pointless plans. I took a walk by myself and had lunch at 'Jimmy John's' a sub shop that I like better than the other franchise sub shops. While I was sitting, lost in thought, and only marginally listening to two businessmen in the booth next to me talk about taking trips to Miami and where to find the good escorts (the converstaion ended with 'Remember to bring bail money') I was pondering many things.

1) How storage is allocated on AIX OS disks (allocated in to Physical Partitions, PPs, discrete pieces of space of a certain size, volumes are built by allocating PPs from wherever free on the disk) vs how Solaris does it (8 slices, slice 2 which is untouchable and sices 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, which are defined via cylinders in to set chunks on which the file systems are built). I was evaluating the pros and cons. I like the AIX way better as it allows for more flexibility, it is a pity that I do not like the AIX OS. If only you could merge the Solaris OS with the AIX LVM.

2) AllThingsSpring is really right, the two dominant parties are just different faces of Janus. They are both racing to the 'middle' which means nothing really. There really isn't much to differeniate them, other than the Republicans have on their half of the spectrum the fanatical evangelical christians, while the left (although not for much longer) have the liberal secular eco-fanatics. But the Democrats haven't realized it yet that they have last the far left side of their party because they try to be too centrist in a vain attempt to win elections against the Republicans. Being a centrist isn't going to win elections anymore, you just end up looking wishy-washy. Democrats, if they want to regain power need to quit going to the center and start making strong stances on issues AND more importantly start challenging their opponents. This also means they have to form a concise message and stick with it, even if the polls go south. I wish I knew a way to trump the GOP's 'fear factor' that they whip out early and flog often. The left needs to understand that no amount of logic or reasoning can counter that, and countering is damn hard. I wish I had the answer to this.

3) The US Patriot Act was renewed, almost unchanged. What happened to the uproar over this? What happened to the promise of investigation and the reworking to protect civil liberties?

4) Instead of investigating the White House on allegations of illegal spying, the GOP controlled Intelligence committee and the Judiciary decided it would be better to not investigate and instead draft legislation to make it legal.

#s 3 and 4 are why we need a shake up in gov't. Unforunately there is usually very little turn over and it is impossible almost to dislodge incumbents, especially after the last round of Gerrimandering, where lines were redrawn to ensure incumbent wins.

I am so glad the mainstream media isn't reporting any of this, we are being screwed but no one knows because our sources of news are corporate owned.

I was happy to hear the independent movie making is on the rise, George Lucas after the Oscar's predicted film is dead. I say about time the old Hollywood dies.

2 comments:

Avindair said...

I for one am all about the old Hollywood model changing.

There used to be a wonderful book out called The The Independent Producer's Manual. Sure it had some dry stuff in it, but it was written because the writer was tired of the way Hollywood was run.

Why?

To quote him:

" The studios allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to basically this same community of name talents, technicians and executives (even if they are totally unethical or corrupt) because these are the only people that have been trained to make pictures (using tens of millions of dollars) that even have a chance of being a blockbuster. The studios only have to perpetuate and nourish this group because they want to keep the supply of high-budget pictures artificially low enough to drive the demand in the marketplace up high enough to stay out of the red until the blockbuster comes along. They have to operate this way because the number of blockbusters is not great enough."

In short, "We've got a shitty business model, but it keeps us rich, rich, rich!"

Yeah. What a bunch of winners.

Me? I just want to make stuff available for download to a video iPod...at a reasonable fee ($2-$3), of course.

Get rich? No.

Make money? Sure.

Pernox said...

If I actually had talent (that is why I criticize, I have no ability to create, I just know what I like) I would probably release all must stuff either licensed Creative Commons, or just give it away with a caveat, to please acknowledge me. I think it is ok to charge for material, as everyone has expenses, but charge excessive amounts (like the price of most movie tickets) for tripe? No way. Not only that it makes a bunch of no talent hacks think they have skill and encourages them to make more things that can cause us to suffer even further...even if you do not see the movie (due to advertising blitz). I have a rule of thumb, created the hard way through experience, the total suckage of a movie is directly proporational to the amount of advertising it gets.

Examples:

Blair Witch, no ads = good movie
Matrix I, hardly any ads = good movie
Dick Tracey, gajillion ads = total suckage
Star Wars EP 1-3, lot of ads = unforgiveable suckage

I really enjoy 'indie' movies made by people like you avindair, assuming that the telco's don't destroy the internet, this will be how movie (and TV) will be watched in the future.